Chapter 8

Segment playbooks

Six segments, one playbook each, all nine parts the same so you can find the bit you need in a meeting. Who buys, what the hook is, what triggers the purchase, who you are really against, three opening lines, the pricing unit, the objections you only hear here, the calendar, and what the first 30 days of a pilot look like.

The order to work them

Agencies, then education, then B2B SaaS, then professional services, then publishers, then e-commerce. Agencies buy repeatedly and resell. Education is where Proofed already has standing. B2B SaaS has the loudest trigger. The last three are slower and larger, and are worth starting six months before you need the revenue.^S38

The hook that applies to all six

Google's own published guidance is the single most useful document in this chapter, because every buyer has heard that "AI content gets penalised" and almost none of them has read the source. Google says generative AI "can be particularly useful when researching a topic, and to add structure to original content", that using it "to generate many pages without adding value for users may violate Google's spam policy on scaled content abuse", and that "sharing information about how a piece of content was created can help give your readers more context". The page was last updated 10 December 2025.^S36

The line, in every segment. "Google's policy is about scaled content abuse, which is publishing many pages to manipulate rankings without adding value. It is production-method neutral: the same policy applies to a human writing thin pages at volume. Ten researched, briefed, professionally edited articles a month is the opposite of what that policy targets, and Google explicitly says disclosure helps." Have the URL to hand. Do not paraphrase it from memory.

1. Agencies and SEO shops that resell content

25 accounts on the list. 13 UK, 12 US. 14 priority 1. The only segment that buys repeatedly and resells at its own margin.

1. Who buys, who signs

In a five to twenty person agency the founder buys and signs on the same call. Above thirty people the head of content or delivery director evaluates and the founder or managing director signs, usually within a fortnight. There is no procurement process and no security review below about a hundred people. The person who will actually use it is an account director who is currently chasing three freelancers by email.

2. The commercial hook

Margin on a resold line item. An agency billing a client for content buys writing at $0.10 to $0.14 a word from a freelance bench^S22 and bills it out inside a retainer. At $250 a finished, edited article they buy the same deliverable for about 16.7 cents a word with the editing and the project management already inside it, and stop paying for the coordination. One San Francisco agency on the list advertises $40 to $50 an hour for contract writers, which is the number to quote back at them.^S38

3. Trigger events

An open writer or content vacancy. Fourteen of the twenty-five are advertising for one right now. A vacancy is a public statement that delivery capacity is short.
A standing "freelance writers wanted" page. Several run a permanent one, which means the bench is a constant management cost.
A new client win announced on LinkedIn. Delivery starts before hiring does.
A maternity or notice-period gap in the content team.
A new service line launch, especially anything branded around GEO or answer-engine optimisation.

4. The incumbent

Their own freelance bench, and the account manager's inbox that coordinates it. Not another software product. They may also have Surfer or Clearscope for optimisation grading,^S16^S17 which is complementary and worth saying so.

5. Three opening lines

You are advertising for a content writer. Before you fill it: we produce finished, professionally edited articles at $250 each, ten in thirty days, white-label. Worth twenty minutes to see whether it beats the req on cost and speed?

I ran a content gap analysis on [client name they publish publicly]. Three subjects their two closest competitors rank for and they have nothing on. Happy to send it, no strings. If it is useful, we also write and edit the articles.

You bill clients for content and buy it per word from freelancers. We sell the finished, edited article at a fixed price, white-label, so the coordination stops being your cost. Ten articles, $2,500, one client account, as a trial.

6. The pricing unit

Per client account. Sell the first pilot against one named client, not against the agency as a whole, because that is how their revenue and their approvals are organised. Then Austen Pro at $299 with one project per client (Pro has five), plus editing per client.^S1 A five-client agency on Pro plus editing is worth more than a retainer and costs you almost no time.

7. Objections you only hear here

They say	Say
"Our clients would be furious if they knew it was AI"	"Then tell them what you tell them now about freelancers: that a professional editor works on every piece. Google's own guidance says disclosure helps rather than hurts.^S36 If a specific client has a no-AI clause, do not use it on that account. We will not be offended"
"Our writers know the client's voice"	"So does a style guide, and you already have one for each client. Give us the guide and three published pieces and compare the fourth against your freelancer's"
"We would be reselling your product at a markup"	"Yes. That is the offer. White-label, your logo, your invoice, your rate"
"What happens when you sell direct to our client?"	"We do not, and it goes in writing in the agreement. One invoice, to you"

8. The calendar

March and April, when agencies push to close client financial-year work, and January, when client content calendars are empty and budgets are fresh. Avoid the last two weeks of December entirely. New client wins are announced continuously and are the best non-seasonal trigger.

9. First 30 days of a pilot

Days 1 to 2. Kickoff with the account director who will actually use it. Get the client's style guide and five published pieces. Agree white-label rules in writing: whose name is on it, what the agency tells the client, who the invoice goes to.
Days 3 to 5. Run the competitor gap analysis on the client's site and turn the three biggest gaps into briefs. Send all ten briefs at once, not in batches.
Days 6 to 10. Brief approval. Expect two rounds. The agency will push back on angle rather than on structure, which is a good sign.
Days 11 to 20. Draft, score, edit. Deliver in batches of three so they can react early.
Day 21. Renewal conversation, before the last article lands. Offer the agency account on Pro plus editing across three clients, not a single-client retainer.
Days 22 to 30. Final delivery. Ask for two things: a written line you can quote, and one introduction to another agency. Agencies know each other.

2. Universities, education and training providers

15 accounts. 10 UK, 5 US. 8 priority 1. The one cold segment where the seller already has standing, because Proofed's editing bench is academic in origin.

1. Who buys, who signs

Head or director of marketing at a university, or a faculty or school marketing manager where budgets are devolved. In the US, an enrolment marketing manager or a department chair. Sign-off is slower than any other segment on this list and often needs a purchase order. In a small independent provider, one person is marketing, recruitment and content, and they sign.

Go to the faculty, not the centre. Several targets on the list are single hires covering enrolment, comms and content for one department. That is a small, fast budget decision. Central marketing is a nine-month conversation.

2. The hook

Course pages and subject guides are the entire organic recruitment funnel, and they are chronically out of date because nobody owns writing them. Several targets are advertising for a digital content officer inside a team of four responsible for a whole web estate.^S38 The secondary hook is academic integrity: an institution cannot publish unedited machine text under its own name, which makes the human edit the price of entry rather than an upsell.

3. Trigger events

An intake deadline. One target's vacancy explicitly cites September 2026 entry targets.
A fixed-term content role, which is a budget that exists and a person who does not.
Clearing and results season, when course pages get traffic they are not ready for.
A new programme launch or a rebrand.
A prospectus refresh, which is a style guide handed to you for free.

4. The incumbent

An overloaded internal team, a freelance copywriter on a framework, or nothing. Occasionally an agency on a marketing framework contract, which is a procurement obstacle rather than a competitor.

5. Three opening lines

Your digital content officer advert says the team is four people for the whole web estate. We produce finished, professionally edited articles and page copy at a fixed price: ten in thirty days, $2,500. That is capacity a team of four does not have, without a headcount case.

Ten of your course pages rank outside the first page for their own subject name. We would rewrite those ten, edited by professional editors who work on academic material every day, and measure organic and AI-answer visibility before and after.

We are the content engine built by the team behind Proofed, whose editors work on academic writing daily. Before your next intake, would ten refreshed subject pages be useful?

6. The pricing unit

Per faculty, school or programme, and tie it to an intake. "Ten subject and careers-outcome pages before the January intake" is a purchase order a department can raise. A university-wide retainer is a procurement exercise, not a sale, and should never be the first ask. For a small independent provider with a one-person marketing function, sell Starter at $99, not the pilot.

7. Objections you only hear here

They say	Say
"We cannot publish AI-written content about our own courses"	"You would not be. You approve the brief, our editor edits the draft, and your team accepts or declines every tracked change. The published page is yours, edited by a person, exactly like a freelance brief"
"It has to go through procurement"	"At $2,500 it usually does not, if it is scoped to one faculty. If it does, we will fill in the forms. Chapter 10 has the answers ready"
"Our academics will not accept edited copy"	"Tracked changes, not rewrites. They accept or decline each one. That is the same workflow they use for a journal edit"
"Our budget year ends in July"	"Then buy the pilot in June and deliver it in July. It is a single one-off invoice, which is easier to land at year end than a subscription"

8. The calendar

UK: September to November for the next intake, and January to March for late-cycle recruitment. Avoid August, when everyone is in clearing or on leave. US: enrolment marketing runs on a different clock per institution, so ask rather than assume. Budget years typically end in July in UK higher education, which makes June a strong month for a one-off invoice.

9. First 30 days of a pilot

Days 1 to 3. Kickoff with the faculty marketing manager. Get the prospectus, the brand guidelines and the ten underperforming pages. Agree what "better" is measured as: organic position, or citation in AI answers, or both. Record the baseline.
Days 4 to 8. Briefs for all ten pages, each one naming the query it is written for. Start each from the live page: Austen's Refresh reads the existing page, lists its gaps and pre-fills a brief for approval. Paste the text of any page it cannot read.
Days 9 to 12. Approval. Expect an academic reviewer to be added at this point. Welcome it; build the extra round into the schedule.
Days 13 to 25. Draft, score, edit. Deliver in two batches.
Day 21. Renewal conversation, framed around the next intake and the next faculty, not around a monthly subscription.
Days 26 to 30. Deliver, send the baseline in writing, and agree the date for the after comparison, because a page published this week will not have moved yet. In this segment the written evidence travels internally to three other faculties.

3. B2B SaaS, 20 to 300 staff

30 accounts. 15 UK, 15 US. 18 priority 1. The loudest trigger on the list, because the vacancy states the budget.

1. Who buys, who signs

Head of marketing or VP marketing. Below fifty staff the founder signs, often on the first call. Above a hundred, the head of marketing signs within their discretionary limit and $2,500 is comfortably inside it. The person who feels the pain is whoever is currently writing the blog on top of their real job.

2. The hook

An open content req is a public statement that the budget exists, the work is not getting done, and nobody will start for three to four months. The pilot costs less than one month of the salary being advertised, and delivers while they are still interviewing. Several targets are hiring a founding content marketer, which means there is no engine at all.^S38

3. Trigger events

An open content marketing req, especially a founding or senior one.
A funding round. Several targets on the list closed a Series B or C in 2026 and are building the GTM content function from scratch.
A job advertisement that names AEO or GEO explicitly. Two do. That is a direct match to what Austen produces and the first email should mirror their own words back.
A product launch or category repositioning, which needs content faster than a team can write it.
US or UK market expansion, which doubles the content requirement without doubling the team.

4. The incumbent

The open req itself, a freelancer, or ChatGPT in the marketing manager's browser. Occasionally an agency retainer they are unhappy with, in which case the average of $3,209 a month is the number to compare against.^S26

5. Three opening lines

You are hiring a content marketing manager. Whoever you hire will not publish anything for about four months. We deliver ten finished, professionally edited articles in thirty days for $2,500, which is less than one month of the salary on that advert. Worth a look while you interview?

Your job advert asks for SEO and AEO ownership. That is exactly what we build: every article is scored on a search rubric and an AI-answer-engine rubric, revised against both, and delivered with both scores showing. Ten of them in thirty days, edited by professional editors.

I ran a content gap analysis against [two named competitors]. Three subjects they both rank for and you have nothing on. The report is attached, no strings. If you want the articles, we write and edit them at a fixed price.

6. The pricing unit

Per article, then per month. This is the segment most likely to convert to Pro at $299 and run it themselves, which is a good outcome, not a failure. Push the retainer only where the marketing team is one person and stays one person.

7. Objections you only hear here

They say	Say
"Our product is too technical for AI to write about"	"Probably true for a deep architecture piece. Upload a recorded engineering webinar or a customer call and it writes from your team's own arguments, transcribed, then a person edits it. Try one and judge it"
"We are hiring someone to do this"	"Good. Hire them. Then hand them a working engine and ten published articles on day one instead of an empty content calendar"
"We use ChatGPT already"	See Chapter 9. It is the most common objection in this segment and it has a specific answer
"How do we know it will not read like AI?"	"There is a tell gate before delivery, a hard rule against em dashes enforced by tests, and a professional editor afterwards. If a piece still reads wrong, tell us and it is fixed within the pilot"

8. The calendar

January, when annual plans start and content calendars are empty. September, after the summer. Immediately after any funding announcement. Avoid the last three weeks of December and the first week of the US Thanksgiving week.

9. First 30 days of a pilot

Days 1 to 2. Kickoff. Name three competitors, the ICP, and the two or three product terms they want to own. Connect Google Search Console if they will, so the before-and-after is measurable rather than argued.
Days 3 to 5. Crawl the competitors, produce the real gap report, and turn the top gaps into briefs. Send the gap report as a document in its own right. It is the artefact that gets forwarded internally.
Days 6 to 9. Brief approval. Expect the head of marketing to change three of the ten. That is the process working.
Days 10 to 22. Draft, score, edit, deliver in three batches so their feedback lands early.
Day 21. Renewal conversation with the search-console numbers, or with the honest statement that four weeks is too short to show ranking movement and here is what has changed instead.
Days 23 to 30. Deliver, publish to their CMS if they want it, and ask for a reference and one introduction to a peer marketing lead.

4. Professional services: law, accounting, consulting

20 accounts. 11 UK, 9 US. 5 priority 1. Slow, procurement-heavy, and the budgets are real.

1. Who buys, who signs

Chief marketing officer, head of marketing and communications, or business development director. In a large firm, a practice group leader or sector head can fund a pilot out of their own budget, which is the faster route. The person who actually feels the pain is a marcomms manager sitting on a queue of partner drafts nobody has time to edit.

2. The hook

Fee-earners bill every available hour and will not write. The firm's credibility depends on published insight. One firm on the list is advertising a single content manager to own all written thought leadership across three cities at around GBP 60,000; another is advertising a marketing manager at $150,000 to $200,000.^S38 A $2,500 pilot against those numbers is a rounding error, and it is a comparison that can be made in the first email.

3. Trigger events

A content or marketing vacancy with a published salary. The costed comparison writes the email.
A new office or practice-group launch, which needs a burst of local and practice-area content the central team cannot absorb.
A regulatory or fiscal event. A Budget or a new statute creates a two-week window where explainers rank and everyone is late.
A partner webinar or conference paper that exists as a recording and never became an article.
An insights hub whose publishing cadence has visibly slipped. Check the date on the last three posts.
A large back catalogue of dated insight pieces. Austen can improve an existing article from its URL: light edits as tracked changes on the original, or a refresh or rewrite from a brief the firm approves.

4. The incumbent

Partners who do not write, one marcomms person, and a queue. Sometimes a PR agency on retainer, which does press rather than search content and is not the same purchase.

5. Three opening lines

You are advertising for one content manager to own all written thought leadership across three offices. We produce finished, professionally edited articles at a fixed price: ten in thirty days for $2,500, less than one month of that salary. Useful as cover while the role is open?

Two of your partners published on [topic] this year. Neither piece ranks and neither is cited in AI answers for the obvious queries. We would rewrite both and write three more, edited by professional editors, and show you the before and after.

Your [sector] insight hub has not published since [month]. We write from your partners' existing material: a webinar recording, a client alert, a conference paper, turned into finished, edited articles. Ten of them in thirty days.

6. The pricing unit

Per practice group or sector team. Never sell firm-wide first: the approval chain is long and the champion is whoever runs one practice. A pilot on one practice group, measured, becomes an internal case study that sells the second and third without you.

7. Objections you only hear here

They say	Say
"This is legal or financial content. It has to be accurate"	"Which is why every piece is researched against live sources, edited by a professional, and reviewed by your fee-earner before publication. We are not removing your review step, we are removing the drafting step in front of it"
"Our partners will not put their name on something they did not write"	"They approve the brief, and they accept or decline every tracked change. That is more control than they have over a junior's draft"
"We have professional indemnity considerations"	"Then your existing review process stays exactly as it is. Nothing here changes who signs off. Chapter 10 covers ownership and disclosure in writing"
"We need it to be confidential"	"No client matter goes near it. We write from published material, briefs you approve, and recordings you choose to give us"

8. The calendar

Fiscal and legislative events are the calendar in this segment: a Budget, a new statute commencing, a regulatory deadline. UK firms plan marketing budgets between October and December. Avoid August and the last two weeks of December. In the US, plan around the firm's own fiscal year, which is usually calendar.

9. First 30 days of a pilot

Days 1 to 3. Kickoff with the practice group leader and the marcomms manager together. Agree the review chain in writing and who has final sign-off. This is the step that saves the pilot.
Days 4 to 8. Harvest existing material: webinar recordings, client alerts, conference papers. Briefs built from what the firm has already said, not from a brainstorm.
Days 9 to 14. Approval, which will take longer here than in any other segment. Chase politely and on schedule.
Days 15 to 26. Draft, score, edit. Deliver each piece to the named fee-earner for review, not to a shared inbox.
Day 21. Renewal conversation with the practice leader, framed as a second practice group rather than as a larger contract.
Days 27 to 30. Deliver, and write a one-page internal summary the champion can circulate. In this segment the internal document is the sales asset.

5. Publishers and media with commercial content desks

15 accounts. 8 UK, 7 US. 7 priority 1. Approach the studio, never the newsroom.

1. Who buys, who signs

Head of branded content, commercial content director, head of content studio, or director of SEO. Never an editor-in-chief and never a journalist. The commercial desk has its own budget, its own deadlines and its own tolerance for outside supply, and it is a different organisation from editorial in everything but the building.

2. The hook

Sponsored and commerce content is volume-committed to an advertiser with a contractual deadline, and the desk is staffed for a normal month. Targets on the list are hiring commercial content editors, deals editors and SEO managers across affiliate and branded studios.^S38 You are surge capacity for a campaign, which is a much easier thing to buy than a strategic partnership.

3. Trigger events

A maternity or notice-period gap on a commercial desk. One target is advertising explicit maternity cover.
A new commerce or deals vertical being stood up. Two are.
A large sponsor campaign with a fixed delivery date.
Seasonal commerce peaks: Black Friday, January sales, back to school.
An SEO leadership hire, which usually precedes a volume push.

4. The incumbent

A freelance editor bench, and the desk's own staff working late. Rarely software. The competitive question is never "which tool" but "can you hit the sponsor's deadline without embarrassing us".

5. Three opening lines

You are covering a branded content editor role. We are surge capacity for exactly that gap: finished, professionally edited articles at a fixed price, ten in thirty days, to your style guide, delivered as tracked changes your editor accepts or declines.

Your deals desk publishes to a sponsor deadline. We can add ten finished, edited pieces in thirty days without a contract or a headcount case, and stop again when the campaign does.

We are the content engine built by the team behind Proofed, whose editors work with publishers and media houses. If your commercial desk has a campaign with more volume than people, that is the conversation.

6. The pricing unit

Per campaign. A publisher's commercial desk buys a defined quantity against a sponsor deliverable. Price the pilot as one campaign's overflow. A retainer only makes sense once you have delivered two campaigns without a problem.

7. Objections you only hear here

They say	Say
"Our sponsors would not accept AI-written copy"	"Then disclose it. Google's own guidance says telling readers how content was made adds context, and every piece is professionally edited before it reaches you.^S36 If a specific sponsor contract forbids it, do not use it on that campaign"
"Our style guide is very specific"	"Give it to us. It becomes structured rules the engine writes against, and the editor checks against. That is more consistent than a freelancer reading a PDF"
"Editorial would object"	"Editorial should. We are not selling to editorial. This is commercial content with a sponsor and a deadline"
"We need it in our CMS"	"WordPress directly, or a signed webhook into anything else. Or we hand you files and you paste them, which is what your freelancers do now"

8. The calendar

Commerce desks peak from September to December and again in January. Branded content follows the advertiser's campaign calendar, which usually means bursts around quarter starts. The best time to approach is six to eight weeks before a peak, when the desk is planning capacity and has not yet booked freelancers.

9. First 30 days of a pilot

Days 1 to 2. Kickoff with the commercial content lead. Get the style guide, the sponsor's brief, and the disclosure rules in writing. Establish who the accepting editor is.
Days 3 to 5. Ten briefs matched to the campaign's queries and the sponsor's messages, approved by the desk before anything is written.
Days 6 to 20. Draft, score, edit, deliver in weekly batches to fit the desk's own publishing rhythm.
Day 18. Earlier renewal conversation than other segments, because the next campaign is already being planned.
Days 21 to 30. Deliver and hit every deadline exactly. In this segment reliability is the entire product and one late batch ends the relationship.

6. E-commerce brands with editorial content

15 accounts. 6 UK, 9 US. 5 priority 1. The human edit is the whole purchase, not an upsell.

1. Who buys, who signs

Head of content, ecommerce director or head of growth. In a small brand, the founder. In a supplements, skincare or nutrition brand there is a second, invisible buyer: whoever signs off claims, whether that is a medical director, a regulatory adviser or a cautious general counsel. Find them in the first call, because they can stop the purchase silently.

2. The hook

An unedited AI claim on a product page is a compliance event, not a quality problem. Skincare, supplements and nutrition brands on this list compete on ingredient and science explainer content where the claim is the risk. One prescription skincare target has every claim passing medical and regulatory review, which makes an unedited draft literally unusable to them.^S38 That is the strongest human-edit argument in this guide.

3. Trigger events

A content or digital marketing vacancy, particularly one naming SEO and GEO together.
A category or product launch, which needs buying-guide and comparison content the product pages do not cover.
A new market, which needs the same briefs in a second voice or language.
A retail partnership or new stockist range, which creates a pile of category guides nobody has written.
A competitor outranking them on their own category query. Free to check, and it makes an excellent first email.

4. The incumbent

Usually nothing, or an intern with an assistant. Sometimes an SEO agency doing technical work and not writing. The comparison is rarely to another product and almost always to "we keep meaning to".

5. Three opening lines

Your product pages rank. Your category and comparison queries do not, and [competitor] owns three of them. Ten buying guides and comparison articles, professionally edited, in thirty days, $2,500.

Every claim on an ingredient explainer has to survive review before it goes live, which makes an unedited AI draft useless to you. Ours are edited by professional editors and returned as tracked changes your reviewer accepts or declines. Ten of them in thirty days.

You are hiring for SEO and GEO. We produce articles scored against both a search rubric and an AI-answer-engine rubric, edited by a person before delivery. Happy to send an answer-engine visibility report for your category queries first, free.

6. The pricing unit

Per category or per market. Ten buying guides for one category, or the same ten briefs produced in brand voice for two markets. A small brand with no in-house writer should be sold Starter at $99, not the pilot; do not push a $2,500 purchase at a twenty-person brand that needs three articles a month.

7. Objections you only hear here

They say	Say
"Our claims have to be reviewed by a medical or regulatory person"	"They still will be. We add a professional editor before that review, so what lands on your reviewer's desk is finished rather than raw. That makes their job shorter, not longer"
"Generic AI copy is instantly off brand for us"	"Agreed, and it is why the style guide and the tone-of-voice step come first. Give us your guide and five published pieces before we write anything"
"We tried an AI tool and the output was unusable"	"What you tried sold you a draft. Nobody edited it. That is the difference, and it is the reason for the price"
"Will this hurt our SEO?"	The scaled content abuse answer at the top of this chapter, with the URL^S36

8. The calendar

Content for the Q4 peak is planned in August and September, which makes late summer the best approach window. January is the second window, for new-year category content. Avoid November and December entirely: nobody in e-commerce buys anything new during peak trading.

9. First 30 days of a pilot

Days 1 to 3. Kickoff with the content owner and the claims reviewer in the same call. Get the style guide, the claims policy and the list of words that cannot be used. Agree what happens when the editor and the reviewer disagree.
Days 4 to 7. Category and competitor research, then ten briefs aimed at real category queries, each naming the claim boundaries up front.
Days 8 to 12. Approval, including the reviewer. Their sign-off on the briefs is what makes the articles pass later.
Days 13 to 24. Draft, score, edit, deliver in batches of three or four.
Day 21. Renewal conversation framed as the next category, or the next market, not as a subscription.
Days 25 to 30. Deliver, publish, and record the query positions on delivery day so the next conversation has a baseline.

What these playbooks do not claim

No conversion rate is stated per segment, because none has been measured. The ordering is a judgement about fit and cycle length, not a prediction.
No customer, testimonial or result appears in any playbook. Where one would normally go, the honest line is "you would be early".
The triggers are as of 4 September 2026 and several will have expired. Re-check before use.
Nothing here is legal or regulatory advice, particularly in the professional services and e-commerce sections. What it does is tell you which question to ask the buyer's own reviewer.

← 120 targets Sales kit →